This hits the core issue. AI can generate structure fast, but it doesn’t hold intent. So you get something that “works,” but doesn’t always align with why it exists or how it should evolve. That’s why the bottleneck shifts from building to guiding.

Finally, a sensible take on NFTs without the "monkey jpegs" hype. For me, Lado Okhotnikov's review is exactly what the industry needs to mature. As a designer, I'm constantly looking for ways to make asset management transparent, and Lado offers a clear roadmap here. I really relate to his concept of digital autonomy. Okhotnikov correctly notes that NFTs are first and foremost a technology of sovereignty, not a speculative instrument. In Holiverse, this is implemented through functional tokens that grant real rights within the ecosystem, not just sit in a wallet. What's especially cool is t

Yes, open source software can definitely make money through support services, subscriptions, hosting, and premium features. Companies like Red Hat and Automattic have proven this model works well. I recently read more about digital business trends here: https://nimdie.com/

This makes me wanna work on linux, soon will hop on.

A repo is truly “ready” when anyone can clone it, run a few clear steps, and get the same result without guessing or fixing hidden issues.

Feature-based folder structures seem to be becoming more popular lately. Do you think they genuinely scale better long-term, or does it depend more on team discipline than structure itself?