Do you measure code coverage of your manual testing efforts?



Write your answer…

I feel like manual tests are usually more like integration tests than unit tests. This makes it a bit easier to estimate how much of the functionality you're covering, rather than how much of the code.

Which seems like a more useful metric. It's just hard to estimate it for unit tests.

You'll probably not get near 100% coverage manually, it's better to try and test the most critical parts rather than the parts with most code.

Reply to this…

Vijay Thirugnanam's photo

Vijay Thirugnanam


Engineer, Architect.




Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Joined on

Apr 21, 2016

Welcome to Hashnode
the dev community

The programming forum to discuss topics broader than bugs and issues, write and share knowledge and connect with the best developers.