(44 questions) Take me to the AMA
I don't see PoW change as necessary or desirable. The hash rate is in pools, which have lots of individual miners. The problem is that two things are currently conflated: mining reward variance reduction and block construction. The main danger is in pools controlling the latter. The former is absolutely desirable.
I think Matt Corallo's BetterHash would be a great way to separate the two concerns and decrease the main risk.
The assumptions under which people get scared about PoW 51% attacks is an economic actor which somehow gets some irretrievable good or service that costs a lot of money (many hundreds of bitcoins) through double spending. This is really hard to pull off in practice and pretty hard to get away with, so I don't really worry about it. The economic incentives generally align pretty well.
Reply to this…