---
title: "Discussion on \"A Blank Password Field and a Relay Trap: What the ScreenConnect SCKit Attack Actually Teaches\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"A Blank Password Field and a Relay Trap: What the ScreenConnect SCKit Attack Actually Teaches\". On November 11, 2026, at 17:47 UTC, someone started pushing commands through cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels belonging to managed service providers. Within 90 minutes, at least 288 endpoints across"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/a-blank-password-field-and-a-relay-trap-what-the-screenconnect-sckit-attack-actually-teaches/6af58e02c786a136c85065ea"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [A Blank Password Field and a Relay Trap: What the ScreenConnect SCKit Attack Actually Teaches](https://damianobianda.hashnode.dev/a-blank-password-field-and-a-relay-trap-what-the-screenconnect-sckit-attack-actually-teaches?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

On November 11, 2026, at 17:47 UTC, someone started pushing commands through cloud-hosted ScreenConnect panels belonging to managed service providers. Within 90 minutes, at least 288 endpoints across

12h ago · 7 min read · damianobianda.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#cybersecurity](https://hashnode.com/tag/cybersecurity)
-   [#infosec](https://hashnode.com/tag/infosec)
-   [#security](https://hashnode.com/tag/security)

## Written by

[Damiano Bianda](https://hashnode.com/@damianobianda)

@damianobianda

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@damianobianda)

Full-stack developer: Nuxt, Vue, TypeScript, Python. Based in Ticino.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.