---
title: "Discussion on \"A reproducible test: Claude reviews the same PR twice, with and without context\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"A reproducible test: Claude reviews the same PR twice, with and without context\". Most of what I read about LLM code review is \"we tried it, it works.\" That's not enough to be useful. I want to know: same model, same PR, two different review contexts - does the output actually chan"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/a-reproducible-test-claude-reviews-the-same-pr-twice-with-and-without-context/6a0164b00dc47f5a5d093bd6"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [A reproducible test: Claude reviews the same PR twice, with and without context](https://scottthurman.hashnode.dev/a-reproducible-test-claude-reviews-the-same-pr-twice-with-and-without-context?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Most of what I read about LLM code review is "we tried it, it works." That's not enough to be useful. I want to know: same model, same PR, two different review contexts - does the output actually chan

May 11 · 5 min read · scottthurman.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

## Written by

[Scott Thurman](https://hashnode.com/@scottthurman89)

@scottthurman89

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@scottthurman89)

Tools that help engineers ship better code, faster.

I build small developer tools that punch above their weight. Currently focused on LLM-aided code review.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.