---
title: "Discussion on \"What AI Code Review Quietly Removes From Engineering Teams\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"What AI Code Review Quietly Removes From Engineering Teams\". AI review tools catch bugs faster than humans, but in healthcare software they're also stripping out the mentorship and judgment-building that human review used to provide."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/ai-code-review-healthcare-engineering-mentorship/6abd23f8a5aad5fba3593869"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [What AI Code Review Quietly Removes From Engineering Teams](https://humanbusinessworks.hashnode.dev/ai-code-review-healthcare-engineering-mentorship?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

AI review tools catch bugs faster than humans, but in healthcare software they're also stripping out the mentorship and judgment-building that human review used to provide.

Sep 30 · 7 min read · humanbusinessworks.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#healthcare](https://hashnode.com/tag/healthcare)
-   [#mentorship](https://hashnode.com/tag/mentorship)
-   [#ai](https://hashnode.com/tag/ai)
-   [#engineering](https://hashnode.com/tag/engineering)
-   [#workplace-culture](https://hashnode.com/tag/workplace-culture)

## Written by

[Human Business Works](https://hashnode.com/@humanbusinessworks)

@humanbusinessworks · Miami, FL

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@humanbusinessworks)

The people behind the business / Business, told through people / Where enterprise meets humanity

## Responses 1

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

[Parsa Mohammadi](https://hashnode.com/@tomosu)

[Oct 1](https://hashnode.com/posts/ai-code-review-healthcare-engineering-mentorship/6abd23f8a5aad5fba3593869/comment/6abe667557750b9715d545df)

A static list goes stale fast. The module behind last quarter's incident often isn't on it yet. Scoring each change against what has actually broken before keeps that list current, and tells the human reviewer which PRs deserve a real comment instead of a click.

The audit point lands too. "A check ran" is a timestamp. A verdict that records why a change was judged safe or not is something a person can stand behind. That's the gap Tomosu works on: a reliability score and merge verdict on every PR with the reasoning attached, using incident history once it's connected, and a human still making the call.