---
title: "Discussion on \"4 Augmented Reality Live Streaming SDKs Compared on the Frame Budget\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"4 Augmented Reality Live Streaming SDKs Compared on the Frame Budget\". DeepAR, BytePlus Effects, Snap Kit and MediaPipe compared for live streaming: frame rates, face limits, platforms and access, from their own docs."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/ar-live-streaming-sdks-compared/6af072e923ee5741ea46142a"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [4 Augmented Reality Live Streaming SDKs Compared on the Frame Budget](https://dave-talks.hashnode.dev/ar-live-streaming-sdks-compared?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

DeepAR, BytePlus Effects, Snap Kit and MediaPipe compared for live streaming: frame rates, face limits, platforms and access, from their own docs.

5d ago · 14 min read · dave-talks.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#augmented-reality](https://hashnode.com/tag/augmented-reality)
-   [#live-streaming](https://hashnode.com/tag/live-streaming)
-   [#android](https://hashnode.com/tag/android)
-   [#ios](https://hashnode.com/tag/ios)
-   [#webdev](https://hashnode.com/tag/webdev)

## Written by

[Dave Gordon](https://hashnode.com/@davegordon)

@davegordon · Austin, USA

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@davegordon)

Independent benchmarks. AI, AR, ML.

I build AR and ML features for mobile and web, and I test the SDKs that promise to make that easy. Most of them look great in a demo and very different on a five-year-old Android. I write down which parts hold up.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.