---
title: "Comment by Atul Vishwakarma on \"AWS ECS auto-scaler is broken\n(don’t worry, we’ve fixed it) \" | Hashnode"
description: "This is a really insightful comparison! The distinction you draw between AWS ECS's traditional autoscaling (which reacts to metrics) and Platformatic ICC's pred"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/aws-ecs-autoscaler-vs-platformatic-icc/6a21a6ed47270a41c4f62bf8/comment/6a21ae1f09761aac249266ba"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/aws-ecs-autoscaler-vs-platformatic-icc/6a21a6ed47270a41c4f62bf8)

Comment [AWS ECS auto-scaler is broken (don’t worry, we’ve fixed it)](https://hashnode.com/posts/aws-ecs-autoscaler-vs-platformatic-icc/6a21a6ed47270a41c4f62bf8)

[Atul Vishwakarma](https://hashnode.com/@vatul16)

[Jun 4](https://hashnode.com/posts/aws-ecs-autoscaler-vs-platformatic-icc/6a21a6ed47270a41c4f62bf8/comment/6a21ae1f09761aac249266ba)

This is a really insightful comparison! The distinction you draw between AWS ECS's traditional autoscaling (which reacts to metrics) and Platformatic ICC's predictive/intelligent approach is super clear.

What stood out to me the most:

The latency argument: Waiting for CloudWatch metrics + ECS to react means your app already feels slow to users. ICC's proactive scaling actually makes sense for real-world user experience.

Cost transparency: Breaking down the hidden costs of over-provisioning vs. under-provisioning is something most comparisons skip.

I'm curious though — for smaller startups or side projects where traffic is unpredictable but not necessarily high-volume, would ICC still be cost-effective? Or does the sweet spot come at a certain scale threshold?

Also, the platformatic upgrade command being that simple is tempting 😄 Has anyone tried migrating an existing ECS service to ICC in production? Would love to hear war stories if so.

Great write-up, definitely making me rethink my infrastructure choices!