---
title: "Discussion on \"From GitHub Actions to Agentic Workflows: Evaluating gh-aw on a Side Project\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"From GitHub Actions to Agentic Workflows: Evaluating gh-aw on a Side Project\". I evaluated GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) on a real-time multiplayer game — RLS migration review, PR review, and CI checks. Here's what held up."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/from-github-actions-to-agentic-workflows-evaluating-gh-aw-on-a-side-project/6a52190474743c245ae611ff"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [From GitHub Actions to Agentic Workflows: Evaluating gh-aw on a Side Project](https://engineering-som-blog.hashnode.dev/from-github-actions-to-agentic-workflows-evaluating-gh-aw-on-a-side-project?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

I evaluated GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) on a real-time multiplayer game — RLS migration review, PR review, and CI checks. Here's what held up.

Jul 11 · 6 min read · engineering-som-blog.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#workflow-optimization](https://hashnode.com/tag/workflow-optimization)
-   [#agentic-workflow](https://hashnode.com/tag/agentic-workflow)
-   [#github-actions](https://hashnode.com/tag/github-actions)
-   [#github-copilot](https://hashnode.com/tag/github-copilot)

## Written by

[Somesh](https://hashnode.com/@someshk1703)

@someshk1703 · Chennai, India

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@someshk1703)

full stack developer

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.