---
title: "Comment by Apurv Julaniya on \"I Stopped \"Prompting\" GPT-5. This 45-Line Context Engine Fixed My Hallucinations.\" | Hashnode"
description: "This is a powerful shift—from prompting to system design. Most people still blame hallucinations on the model, but your approach highlights the real issue: lack"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/i-stopped-prompting-gpt-5-this-45-line-context-engine-fixed-my-hallucinations/69ba76cac22d3eeb8a69de77/comment/69ba78d6c22d3eeb8a6b9bd3"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/i-stopped-prompting-gpt-5-this-45-line-context-engine-fixed-my-hallucinations/69ba76cac22d3eeb8a69de77)

Comment [I Stopped "Prompting" GPT-5. This 45-Line Context Engine Fixed My Hallucinations.](https://hashnode.com/posts/i-stopped-prompting-gpt-5-this-45-line-context-engine-fixed-my-hallucinations/69ba76cac22d3eeb8a69de77)

[Apurv Julaniya](https://hashnode.com/@apurvjulaniya)

[Mar 18](https://hashnode.com/posts/i-stopped-prompting-gpt-5-this-45-line-context-engine-fixed-my-hallucinations/69ba76cac22d3eeb8a69de77/comment/69ba78d6c22d3eeb8a6b9bd3)

This is a powerful shift—from prompting to system design. Most people still blame hallucinations on the model, but your approach highlights the real issue: lack of structured context. The idea of a “45-line context engine” is especially interesting because it turns AI usage from: trial-and-error prompting → into deterministic, repeatable workflows That’s where real leverage comes from. Also aligns with what many GPT-5 experiments are showing—structure beats volume when it comes to getting reliable outputs �. Medium Curious to know: How do you handle dynamic context (changing tasks) without breaking the system?