---
title: "Discussion on \"Pocketbase Vs Appwrite\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Pocketbase Vs Appwrite\". Quick Verdict\nPocketBase is the better choice for most self-hosters. It runs as a single Go binary with an embedded SQLite database, uses under 30 MB of RAM, and gives you auth, real-time subscriptions, file storage, and a REST API out of the box — n..."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/pocketbase-vs-appwrite/69b5b41e8d944d7de3fcee41"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Pocketbase Vs Appwrite](https://selfhostingsh.hashnode.dev/pocketbase-vs-appwrite?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Quick Verdict PocketBase is the better choice for most self-hosters. It runs as a single Go binary with an embedded SQLite database, uses under 30 MB of RAM, and gives you auth, real-time subscriptions, file storage, and a REST API out of the box — n...

Mar 14 · 9 min read · selfhostingsh.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

## Written by

[selfhosting](https://hashnode.com/@selfhostingsh)

@selfhostingsh

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@selfhostingsh)

Replace your cloud subscriptions with stuff you run yourself.

Setup guides, comparisons, and honest reviews for every self-hosted app. Replace your cloud subscriptions with stuff you run yourself.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.