---
title: "Discussion on \"QA Test Reporting: Reports People Actually Read\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"QA Test Reporting: Reports People Actually Read\". Most QA reports are written for nobody in particular and get skimmed once. A guide to choosing the report for the audience, the four numbers worth leading with, and why a report that recalculates isn't a record."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/qa-test-reporting-reports-people-actually-read/6abf9901a4e1b65538cc0491"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [QA Test Reporting: Reports People Actually Read](https://hawzu.hashnode.dev/qa-test-reporting-reports-people-actually-read?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Most QA reports are written for nobody in particular and get skimmed once. A guide to choosing the report for the audience, the four numbers worth leading with, and why a report that recalculates isn't a record.

Oct 2 · 8 min read · hawzu.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#software-testing](https://hashnode.com/tag/software-testing)
-   [#quality-assurance](https://hashnode.com/tag/quality-assurance)
-   [#test-management](https://hashnode.com/tag/test-management)
-   [#software-engineering](https://hashnode.com/tag/software-engineering)
-   [#release-management](https://hashnode.com/tag/release-management)

## Written by

[srinath](https://hashnode.com/@srinathy)

@srinathy

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@srinathy)

Building Hawzu. Writing about software quality, uncertainty, and the future of test management.

Software engineer building Hawzu, a modern test management platform. I write about software quality, engineering decisions, and the ideas behind building better tools.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.