---
title: "Discussion on \"QBFT vs IBFT 2.0. How Banks Should Choose a Besu Consensus Algorithm\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"QBFT vs IBFT 2.0. How Banks Should Choose a Besu Consensus Algorithm\". If you looked at Besu consensus a couple of years ago, you probably saw a three-way comparison of Clique, IBFT 2.0, and QBFT. A lot of content still shows that picture, including some of the vendor gu"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/qbft-vs-ibft-2-0-how-banks-should-choose-a-besu-consensus-algorithm/6aeb3508728a0d643eead4fc"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [QBFT vs IBFT 2.0. How Banks Should Choose a Besu Consensus Algorithm](https://zeeve.hashnode.dev/qbft-vs-ibft-2-0-how-banks-should-choose-a-besu-consensus-algorithm?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

If you looked at Besu consensus a couple of years ago, you probably saw a three-way comparison of Clique, IBFT 2.0, and QBFT. A lot of content still shows that picture, including some of the vendor gu

Nov 4 · 11 min read · zeeve.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

## Written by

[Zeeve](https://hashnode.com/@Zeeve)

@Zeeve · California, U.S

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@Zeeve)

The Most Reliable & Secure Blockchain Infrastructure Management Platform

Zeeve is an enterprise-grade low-code Blockchain Infrastructure-as-a-Service platform, compliant with ISO 27001, SOC2 Type II, and GDPR standards. We are the leading provider of Rollups-as-a-Service, dedicated node infrastructure, and hosted subgraphs. All the infrastructure managed by Zeeve includes 24x7 monitoring, Enterprise SLA, 99.9% uptime guarantee, and management dashboards to ensure a secure and scalable infrastructure. With support for all major Blockchains, 27,000+ platform users, and 40+ enterprise clients, Zeeve stands tall as the global go-to provider for Web3 infrastructure.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.
