---
title: "Comment by Daniel Buchner on \"Really Responsive Tables using CSS3 Flexbox\" | Hashnode"
description: "Why not just apply flexbox CSS styles to &lt;table&gt; and &lt;tr&gt; elements themselves? --&gt; http://codepen.io/csuwldcat/pen/JGabQV"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c/comment/56b260f10a7ca0c6f70c3c82"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c)

Comment [Really Responsive Tables using CSS3 Flexbox](https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c)

[Daniel Buchner](https://hashnode.com/@csuwildcat)

[Feb 3, 2016](https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c/comment/56b260f10a7ca0c6f70c3c82)

Why not just apply flexbox CSS styles to <table> and <tr> elements themselves? --> [codepen.io/csuwldcat/pen/JGabQV](http://codepen.io/csuwldcat/pen/JGabQV)

[Vasan Subramanian](https://hashnode.com/@vasan)

[Feb 4, 2016](https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c/comment/56b260f10a7ca0c6f70c3c82#reply-56b2d5e604f0061506b364e4)

Yes, that would work for Plain Wrap. But for the other examples, we need to nest some cells within parent containers to keep them together. I could have indeed used nested tables to achieve this, but I found `<div>`s simpler and easier to deal with in terms of styles.

[GCat](https://hashnode.com/@gregcatalano)

[Apr 16, 2016](https://hashnode.com/posts/really-responsive-tables-using-css3-flexbox/56ab0b76960088c21db4d82c/comment/56b260f10a7ca0c6f70c3c82#reply-5712203b10742993bdb8ced4)

I don't think that will be responsive.
