---
title: "Discussion on \"Rethinking the StarbaseDB Architecture\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Rethinking the StarbaseDB Architecture\". Weighing the pro’s and con’s of migrating routing and logical components from Durable Objects to Workers."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/rethinking-the-starbasedb-architecture/672259c3d567561bb81219b1"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Rethinking the StarbaseDB Architecture](https://braydenwilmoth.hashnode.dev/rethinking-the-starbasedb-architecture?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Weighing the pro’s and con’s of migrating routing and logical components from Durable Objects to Workers.

Oct 30, 2024 · 8 min read · braydenwilmoth.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#starbasedb](https://hashnode.com/tag/starbasedb)
-   [#cloudflare-worker](https://hashnode.com/tag/cloudflare-worker)
-   [#durable-objects](https://hashnode.com/tag/durable-objects)
-   [#databases](https://hashnode.com/tag/databases)
-   [#sqlite](https://hashnode.com/tag/sqlite)

## Written by

[Brayden Wilmoth](https://hashnode.com/@BraydenWilmoth)

@BraydenWilmoth · San Francisco, CA

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@BraydenWilmoth)

CTO of Outerbase. Developing at the speed of design.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.