---
title: "Discussion on \"Running a Two Week Trial of TopoExport and GenAnywhere With a Four Person Team\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Running a Two Week Trial of TopoExport and GenAnywhere With a Four Person Team\". Our studio has four people, three modeling platforms, and a habit of adopting tools because one person saw a good demo. When site models became the bottleneck on a feasibility study, we wrote a brief,"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/running-a-two-week-trial-of-topoexport-and-genanywhere-with-a-four-person-team/6ad857b1ad46e566b31f4bf9"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Running a Two Week Trial of TopoExport and GenAnywhere With a Four Person Team](https://sitemodeling.hashnode.dev/running-a-two-week-trial-of-topoexport-and-genanywhere-with-a-four-person-team?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Our studio has four people, three modeling platforms, and a habit of adopting tools because one person saw a good demo. When site models became the bottleneck on a feasibility study, we wrote a brief,

Oct 21 · 4 min read · sitemodeling.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#aec](https://hashnode.com/tag/aec)
-   [#architecture](https://hashnode.com/tag/architecture)
-   [#3dmodeling](https://hashnode.com/tag/3dmodeling)
-   [#siteanalysis](https://hashnode.com/tag/siteanalysis)
-   [#urban-planning](https://hashnode.com/tag/urban-planning)
-   [#genanywhere](https://hashnode.com/tag/genanywhere)

## Written by

[Site Modeling](https://hashnode.com/@sitemodeling)

@sitemodeling

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@sitemodeling)

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.