---
title: "Comment by OneLifeVibe on \"Same Prompt, Different Test: Using AI Agent Workspaces to Make Testing Repeatable\" | Hashnode"
description: "The Slack number is the part that frames the whole problem well, only about 20 percent of runs following the same sequence. Without that, repeatability sounds l"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/same-prompt-different-test-using-ai-agent-workspaces-to-make-testing-repeatable/6af8931c4aebfdfe7ae23cda/comment/6af896f835d31d8be59a152c"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/same-prompt-different-test-using-ai-agent-workspaces-to-make-testing-repeatable/6af8931c4aebfdfe7ae23cda)

Comment [Same Prompt, Different Test: Using AI Agent Workspaces to Make Testing Repeatable](https://hashnode.com/posts/same-prompt-different-test-using-ai-agent-workspaces-to-make-testing-repeatable/6af8931c4aebfdfe7ae23cda)

[OneLifeVibe](https://hashnode.com/@onelifevibe)

[14h ago](https://hashnode.com/posts/same-prompt-different-test-using-ai-agent-workspaces-to-make-testing-repeatable/6af8931c4aebfdfe7ae23cda/comment/6af896f835d31d8be59a152c)

The Slack number is the part that frames the whole problem well, only about 20 percent of runs following the same sequence. Without that, repeatability sounds like a nice extra instead of the core requirement for regression tests and audits. The three approval gates are the detail I would keep too, especially the one before the write to qTest, since a bad decision saved into a workflow repeats on every run. The point about humans deciding whether a test checks the right thing is the honest limit of the whole approach, and it is good to see it stated plainly.