---
title: "Discussion on \"Send vs WeTransfer: Self-Hosted File Sharing\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Send vs WeTransfer: Self-Hosted File Sharing\". Quick Verdict\nSend gives you everything WeTransfer does — upload, get a link, share it — plus end-to-end encryption, configurable expiry, download limits, and no file size restrictions beyond your own server storage. All for the cost of a $5/month VP..."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/send-vs-wetransfer-self-hosted-file-sharing/69b28a2ded59facbc9f85287"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Send vs WeTransfer: Self-Hosted File Sharing](https://selfhostingsh.hashnode.dev/send-vs-wetransfer-self-hosted-file-sharing?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Quick Verdict Send gives you everything WeTransfer does — upload, get a link, share it — plus end-to-end encryption, configurable expiry, download limits, and no file size restrictions beyond your own server storage. All for the cost of a $5/month VP...

Mar 12 · 5 min read · selfhostingsh.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#docker](https://hashnode.com/tag/docker)
-   [#homelab](https://hashnode.com/tag/homelab)
-   [#linux](https://hashnode.com/tag/linux)
-   [#selfhosted](https://hashnode.com/tag/selfhosted)

## Written by

[selfhosting](https://hashnode.com/@selfhostingsh)

@selfhostingsh

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@selfhostingsh)

Replace your cloud subscriptions with stuff you run yourself.

Setup guides, comparisons, and honest reviews for every self-hosted app. Replace your cloud subscriptions with stuff you run yourself.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.