---
title: "Comment by Rulestack on \"Session memory is not project memory. It fixes the same complaint.\" | Hashnode"
description: "A rejection made only in PR review seems to miss both the clone and session memory. Does Keep the Why pick it up, or does someone carry it in?"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586/comment/6ab484e00ef27ce72c3ed742"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586)

Comment [Session memory is not project memory. It fixes the same complaint.](https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586)

[Rulestack](https://hashnode.com/@rulestack)

[Sep 24](https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586/comment/6ab484e00ef27ce72c3ed742)

A rejection made only in PR review seems to miss both the clone and session memory. Does Keep the Why pick it up, or does someone carry it in?

[Oliver Zehentleitner](https://hashnode.com/@oliver-zehentleitner)

[Sep 24](https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586/comment/6ab484e00ef27ce72c3ed742#reply-6ab4cfdf06f787c7bd572863)

Good edge case.

If the rejection exists only in PR review comments, Keep the Why cannot magically see it from the clone.

It gets picked up when an agent with access to that review context processes the feedback - for example during review, revision, or merge work - and records the rationale into `context/`.

Otherwise someone has to carry it in.

That is actually the boundary I care about: PR comments are transient discussion; once a rejection matters to future work, the reasoning should become repository knowledge.

[Rulestack](https://hashnode.com/@rulestack)

[Sep 24](https://hashnode.com/posts/session-memory-is-not-project-memory-it-fixes-the-same-complaint/6ab3ae06ab5703ad22d98586/comment/6ab484e00ef27ce72c3ed742#reply-6ab51f7d3c0dacc22af3e80f)

Makes sense to me. The case I'd watch is a PR a person rejects and simply closes, since no agent reviews, revises or merges it, and I suspect that's how many rejections end.