---
title: "Comment by Shlomo Friman on \"Setting up WireGuard on Synology DSM 7 using Docker and Gluetun\" | Hashnode"
description: "Solid write-up. The network_mode: service:gluetun pattern for routing dependent containers is clean and underused. One caveat worth adding: any ports those down"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/setting-up-wireguard-on-synology-dsm-7-using-docker-and-gluetun/69f42d8c5d047222f61f4e05/comment/69f46341909e64ad07a14d20"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/setting-up-wireguard-on-synology-dsm-7-using-docker-and-gluetun/69f42d8c5d047222f61f4e05)

Comment [Setting up WireGuard on Synology DSM 7 using Docker and Gluetun](https://hashnode.com/posts/setting-up-wireguard-on-synology-dsm-7-using-docker-and-gluetun/69f42d8c5d047222f61f4e05)

[Shlomo Friman](https://hashnode.com/@shlomofr)

[May 1](https://hashnode.com/posts/setting-up-wireguard-on-synology-dsm-7-using-docker-and-gluetun/69f42d8c5d047222f61f4e05/comment/69f46341909e64ad07a14d20)

Solid write-up. The network\_mode: service:gluetun pattern for routing dependent containers is clean and underused. One caveat worth adding: any ports those downstream containers need have to be declared on the Gluetun container, not on themselves. Catches a lot of people the first time.