---
title: "Discussion on \"SFRA vs SiteGenesis: When Migration Is Worth the Cost\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"SFRA vs SiteGenesis: When Migration Is Worth the Cost\". A B2C Commerce org running on SiteGenesis works fine. Salesforce stopped active SG development in 2017. SFRA is the modern reference architecture. The migration cost is real and the timing decision is more nuanced than the marketing materia"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/sfra-vs-sitegenesis-when-migration-is-worth-the-cost/6a127b6702c892c4d521d495"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [SFRA vs SiteGenesis: When Migration Is Worth the Cost](https://sapotacorpvn.hashnode.dev/sfra-vs-sitegenesis-when-migration-is-worth-the-cost?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

A B2C Commerce org running on SiteGenesis works fine. Salesforce stopped active SG development in 2017. SFRA is the modern reference architecture. The migration cost is real and the timing decision is more nuanced than the marketing materia

May 24 · 7 min read · sapotacorpvn.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#salesforce](https://hashnode.com/tag/salesforce)
-   [#b2c-commerce](https://hashnode.com/tag/b2c-commerce)
-   [#sfcc](https://hashnode.com/tag/sfcc)
-   [#sfra](https://hashnode.com/tag/sfra)
-   [#sitegenesis](https://hashnode.com/tag/sitegenesis)

## Written by

[SapotaCorp](https://hashnode.com/@sapotacorpvn)

@sapotacorpvn · Hanoi, Vietnam

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@sapotacorpvn)

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.