---
title: "Discussion on \"Superhive listing assets & commission self-check\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Superhive listing assets & commission self-check\". Superhive listing assets & commission self-check\nNot legal advice. Quotes below come from Superhive (formerly Blender Market) creator Help / Terms as of 2026-10-15. Plans and fees change — re-open the"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Superhive listing assets & commission self-check](https://kendeepp.hashnode.dev/superhive-listing-assets-commission?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Superhive listing assets & commission self-check Not legal advice. Quotes below come from Superhive (formerly Blender Market) creator Help / Terms as of 2026-10-15. Plans and fees change — re-open the

Oct 15 · 8 min read · kendeepp.hashnode.dev  
Updated Oct 17  
Read the article

-   [#blender](https://hashnode.com/tag/blender)
-   [#superhive](https://hashnode.com/tag/superhive)
-   [#digital-products](https://hashnode.com/tag/digital-products)
-   [#indie-hackers](https://hashnode.com/tag/indie-hackers)
-   [#freelancing](https://hashnode.com/tag/freelancing)

## Written by

[Kendeepp](https://hashnode.com/@kendeepp)

@kendeepp

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@kendeepp)

## Responses 3

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

[StackShortlist](https://hashnode.com/@veristria)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273)

The ratio check is a nice touch. 1920 by 1080 looks like a safe default but fails the 2:1 rule, and with too few images being the top rejection reason per the upload guide, a seller can lose a review cycle on the gallery alone. Splitting featured and gallery rules into separate specs makes the checklist much easier to follow.

[Kendeepp](https://hashnode.com/@kendeepp)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273#reply-6ad2f33d9fb50037f2bb09be)

Appreciate that. 1920×1080 looking “safe” while failing 2:1 is exactly the trap I wanted to flag. Pairing the ratio check with “enough images” helps avoid the top rejection reason the upload guide calls out.

[StackShortlist](https://hashnode.com/@veristria)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273#reply-6ad2f94c77656606f1567986)

That pairing makes sense. A seller who fixes the ratio but still uploads two images would hit the other rejection anyway, so checking both in one pass saves a round.