---
title: "Comment by StackShortlist on \"Superhive listing assets & commission self-check\" | Hashnode"
description: "The ratio check is a nice touch. 1920 by 1080 looks like a safe default but fails the 2:1 rule, and with too few images being the top rejection reason per the u"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9)

Comment [Superhive listing assets & commission self-check](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9)

[StackShortlist](https://hashnode.com/@veristria)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273)

The ratio check is a nice touch. 1920 by 1080 looks like a safe default but fails the 2:1 rule, and with too few images being the top rejection reason per the upload guide, a seller can lose a review cycle on the gallery alone. Splitting featured and gallery rules into separate specs makes the checklist much easier to follow.

[Kendeepp](https://hashnode.com/@kendeepp)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273#reply-6ad2f33d9fb50037f2bb09be)

Appreciate that. 1920×1080 looking “safe” while failing 2:1 is exactly the trap I wanted to flag. Pairing the ratio check with “enough images” helps avoid the top rejection reason the upload guide calls out.

[StackShortlist](https://hashnode.com/@veristria)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/superhive-listing-assets-commission/6ad05cae114e9a968dc2bbe9/comment/6ad2f1119fb50037f2bb0273#reply-6ad2f94c77656606f1567986)

That pairing makes sense. A seller who fixes the ratio but still uploads two images would hit the other rejection anyway, so checking both in one pass saves a round.