---
title: "Discussion on \"The 2:1 Setup That Paid Out at 0.75:1\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"The 2:1 Setup That Paid Out at 0.75:1\". This is one from a bot I run myself, not a client audit — but the same shape shows up often enough in code I review that it's worth writing up on its own. \"Backtest looked fine, live looks worse\" usua"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/the-2-1-setup-that-paid-out-at-0-75-1/6a94855748e0a9d99a147c0d"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [The 2:1 Setup That Paid Out at 0.75:1](https://honest-backtest.hashnode.dev/the-2-1-setup-that-paid-out-at-0-75-1?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

This is one from a bot I run myself, not a client audit — but the same shape shows up often enough in code I review that it's worth writing up on its own. "Backtest looked fine, live looks worse" usua

Aug 30 · 4 min read · honest-backtest.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#trading](https://hashnode.com/tag/trading)
-   [#python](https://hashnode.com/tag/python)

## Written by

[Valerii Sakara](https://hashnode.com/@arakas4488cmd)

@arakas4488cmd

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@arakas4488cmd)

Independent code audits for algorithmic trading bots — real bugs, real backtests, no marketing curves.

I audit algorithmic trading bot code for a living — entry/exit logic, order management, risk handling, fee-honest backtests. I've filed 40+ public responsible-disclosure issues against live open-source trading bots, and audited my own bot the same way before offering this to anyone else.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.