---
title: "Comment by PARAM MITTAL on \"Vite or Webpack? Why not both?\" | Hashnode"
description: "Why not just "Turbopack" ?"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/vite-or-webpack-why-not-both/638d9637fd9018cd0a308a5f/comment/638f3403d8d8c9aa28bd0ec1"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/vite-or-webpack-why-not-both/638d9637fd9018cd0a308a5f)

Comment [Vite or Webpack? Why not both?](https://hashnode.com/posts/vite-or-webpack-why-not-both/638d9637fd9018cd0a308a5f)

[PARAM MITTAL](https://hashnode.com/@parammittal16)

[Dec 6, 2022](https://hashnode.com/posts/vite-or-webpack-why-not-both/638d9637fd9018cd0a308a5f/comment/638f3403d8d8c9aa28bd0ec1)

Why not just ["Turbopack"](https://turbo.build/pack)?

[Kirill](https://hashnode.com/@kirilla)

[Dec 6, 2022](https://hashnode.com/posts/vite-or-webpack-why-not-both/638d9637fd9018cd0a308a5f/comment/638f3403d8d8c9aa28bd0ec1#reply-638f3759895a9daa034fddc5)

Turbopack is a relatively new build tool compared to Vite, so I would not recommend using it in the near future. Also, there are no significant differences between the two of them, both of them very fast.