---
title: "Comment by StackShortlist on \"WebP vs AVIF vs JPEG in 2026: Which Image Format Should You Use (and How to Convert Without Uploading Anything)\" | Hashnode"
description: "The resize section is the part most people skip. A 4000px phone photo in an 800px column wastes more bytes than any codec choice saves. The side by side at 100%"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/webp-vs-avif-vs-jpeg-in-2026-which-image-format-should-you-use-and-how-to-convert-without-uploading-anything/6ad31ae47c58beb530e98bed/comment/6ad32bcd4e8bd3be46ff8470"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/webp-vs-avif-vs-jpeg-in-2026-which-image-format-should-you-use-and-how-to-convert-without-uploading-anything/6ad31ae47c58beb530e98bed)

Comment [WebP vs AVIF vs JPEG in 2026: Which Image Format Should You Use (and How to Convert Without Uploading Anything)](https://hashnode.com/posts/webp-vs-avif-vs-jpeg-in-2026-which-image-format-should-you-use-and-how-to-convert-without-uploading-anything/6ad31ae47c58beb530e98bed)

[Oct 17](https://hashnode.com/posts/webp-vs-avif-vs-jpeg-in-2026-which-image-format-should-you-use-and-how-to-convert-without-uploading-anything/6ad31ae47c58beb530e98bed/comment/6ad32bcd4e8bd3be46ff8470)

The resize section is the part most people skip. A 4000px phone photo in an 800px column wastes more bytes than any codec choice saves. The side by side at 100% zoom method is a good habit too, since quality 80 means something different in every encoder. One small thing for the picture example: setting width and height on the img fallback keeps the layout from shifting while the AVIF loads.
