---
title: "Comment by Steven Mock on \"Why a $500 Website Will Cost You $50,000 in Lost Revenue\" | Hashnode"
description: "The conversion math is the part that sticks with me. A lot of owners compare websites on upfront price alone, because that's the number in front of them. But if"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/why-a-500-website-will-cost-you-50000-in-lost-revenue/698f4bdb048d0184fd643588/comment/6aeecb2f668584320705094c"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-a-500-website-will-cost-you-50000-in-lost-revenue/698f4bdb048d0184fd643588)

Comment [Why a $500 Website Will Cost You $50,000 in Lost Revenue](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-a-500-website-will-cost-you-50000-in-lost-revenue/698f4bdb048d0184fd643588)

[Steven Mock](https://hashnode.com/@stevenmock)

[5d ago](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-a-500-website-will-cost-you-50000-in-lost-revenue/698f4bdb048d0184fd643588/comment/6aeecb2f668584320705094c)

The conversion math is the part that sticks with me. A lot of owners compare websites on upfront price alone, because that's the number in front of them. But if the same traffic converts at 1% instead of 3%, that gap compounds every month — and it's invisible until you work it out the way this piece does.

Speed is the other quiet cost. A slow site doesn't just annoy visitors, it loses them before they ever see the offer, and it hurts visibility too. For a small business, the real question isn't just what the site costs to build, it's what it costs when it doesn't turn visitors into enquiries. Thinking in total cost over a year or two makes the decision a lot clearer.