---
title: "Discussion on \"Why Automated Accessibility Scans Cannot Replace Professional Accessibility Audits\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Why Automated Accessibility Scans Cannot Replace Professional Accessibility Audits\". Automated tools make it easier to identify accessibility issues on websites. They can detect missing image descriptions and certain colour contrast problems. However, they cannot identify every barrie"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/why-automated-accessibility-scans-cannot-replace-professional-accessibility-audits/6af2c8908556e1a917201ed3"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Why Automated Accessibility Scans Cannot Replace Professional Accessibility Audits](https://software-testing-qa.hashnode.dev/why-automated-accessibility-scans-cannot-replace-professional-accessibility-audits?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Automated tools make it easier to identify accessibility issues on websites. They can detect missing image descriptions and certain colour contrast problems. However, they cannot identify every barrie

1d ago · 5 min read · software-testing-qa.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#accessibility-testing](https://hashnode.com/tag/accessibility-testing)
-   [#accessibilitytesting](https://hashnode.com/tag/accessibilitytesting)
-   [#web-accessibility-testing](https://hashnode.com/tag/web-accessibility-testing)

## Written by

[tarunaadhikari](https://hashnode.com/@tarunasdet)

@tarunasdet · Bangalore, India

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@tarunasdet)

Sharing thoughts on QA, software testing, and AI

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.