---
title: "Discussion on \"Why Dynamic Reasoning Beats Static Graphs\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Why Dynamic Reasoning Beats Static Graphs\". Standard vector RAG is great for finding needles, but it’s terrible at describing the haystack. It relies entirely on semantic proximity. That means it often fails at multi-hop reasoning or answering"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/why-dynamic-reasoning-beats-static-graphs/6a8032cc842b6446481159f4"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Why Dynamic Reasoning Beats Static Graphs](https://mundher.com/why-dynamic-reasoning-beats-static-graphs?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Standard vector RAG is great for finding needles, but it’s terrible at describing the haystack. It relies entirely on semantic proximity. That means it often fails at multi-hop reasoning or answering

Aug 15 · 3 min read · mundher.com  
Read the article

## Written by

[Mundher Al-Shabi, PhD](https://hashnode.com/@Mundher)

@Mundher

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@Mundher)

I design and build machine learning models and systems.

## Responses

Comments are turned off for this post.