---
title: "Comment by Michael Maramzin on \"Why Stack Overflow Answers Are Never Quite Right for Your Specific Problem\" | Hashnode"
description: "Stack Overflow helped developers a lot for years, but with AI tools I honestly don’t remember the last time I opened it directly 😊 The open question is where e"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/why-stack-overflow-answers-are-never-quite-right-for-your-specific-problem/6a323c91cf30e75162e4361d/comment/6a34f8f07ee2d1e53448c650"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-stack-overflow-answers-are-never-quite-right-for-your-specific-problem/6a323c91cf30e75162e4361d)

Comment [Why Stack Overflow Answers Are Never Quite Right for Your Specific Problem](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-stack-overflow-answers-are-never-quite-right-for-your-specific-problem/6a323c91cf30e75162e4361d)

[Michael Maramzin](https://hashnode.com/@maramzin)

[Jun 19](https://hashnode.com/posts/why-stack-overflow-answers-are-never-quite-right-for-your-specific-problem/6a323c91cf30e75162e4361d/comment/6a34f8f07ee2d1e53448c650)

Stack Overflow helped developers a lot for years, but with AI tools I honestly don’t remember the last time I opened it directly 😊

The open question is where expert Q&A fits now. AI can work with context, while human experts bring real-world experience and judgment, but that experience also needs to be relevant to the specific problem.

How do you think expert Q&A platforms should handle that matching and validation problem?