---
title: "Discussion on \"Building Two Android Privacy Vaults: Encryption, Decoy PINs and App Disguise\" | Hashnode"
description: "Discussion on \"Building Two Android Privacy Vaults: Encryption, Decoy PINs and App Disguise\". Why I separated two privacy models into Xsilent and MicutVault instead of building one feature-heavy Android application."
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/xsilent-vs-micutvault-android-privacy-vaults/6af0c01b6fda0ca2eca5ea68"
---

[Feed](https://hashnode.com/feed) /

Discussion

# [Building Two Android Privacy Vaults: Encryption, Decoy PINs and App Disguise](https://tsidevstudio.hashnode.dev/xsilent-vs-micutvault-android-privacy-vaults?utm_source=hashnode&utm_medium=feed)

Why I separated two privacy models into Xsilent and MicutVault instead of building one feature-heavy Android application.

4d ago · 8 min read · tsidevstudio.hashnode.dev  
Read the article

-   [#android](https://hashnode.com/tag/android)
-   [#cybersecurity](https://hashnode.com/tag/cybersecurity)
-   [#privacy](https://hashnode.com/tag/privacy)
-   [#mobile-development](https://hashnode.com/tag/mobile-development)
-   [#software-engineering](https://hashnode.com/tag/software-engineering)

## Written by

[TSI DEV Studio](https://hashnode.com/@tsidevstudio)

@tsidevstudio · Bucharest, Romania

  
[View profile](https://hashnode.com/@tsidevstudio)

Indie Android studio building privacy-focused and useful apps.

TSI Dev Studio builds privacy-focused and useful Android apps, with a focus on local-first design, simplicity, and user control.

## Responses

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post

No responses yet.