---
title: "Comment by Elarigent on \"Your AI Agent Will Have an Incident. Here's the 15-Minute Response Plan\" | Hashnode"
description: "The containment ladder is the part I'd steal first — especially C2, draft-only with a human approving every send, since that's the rung that stops a bad answer"
url: "https://hashnode.com/posts/your-ai-agent-will-have-an-incident-here-s-the-15-minute-response-plan/6af185851085047c4da029df/comment/6af1997a79c8674ebaa2c1ee"
---

[Discussion](https://hashnode.com/posts/your-ai-agent-will-have-an-incident-here-s-the-15-minute-response-plan/6af185851085047c4da029df)

Comment [Your AI Agent Will Have an Incident. Here's the 15-Minute Response Plan](https://hashnode.com/posts/your-ai-agent-will-have-an-incident-here-s-the-15-minute-response-plan/6af185851085047c4da029df)

[Elarigent](https://hashnode.com/@enterpriseaiagents)

[2d ago](https://hashnode.com/posts/your-ai-agent-will-have-an-incident-here-s-the-15-minute-response-plan/6af185851085047c4da029df/comment/6af1997a79c8674ebaa2c1ee)

The containment ladder is the part I'd steal first — especially C2, draft-only with a human approving every send, since that's the rung that stops a bad answer from becoming a second incident. Your point about treating the agent as a witness, not an investigator, pairs well with it: build the timeline from logs, then let the postmortem change a control instead of just tweaking a prompt.