Well I think that's a tough one we have different actors
We have two groups the Q and the A. In both of them we have different levels and different expectations. Just take something like nomenclature / semantics - what does mean what to whom? Already we have different levels of expectations.
The explain it to me like I am 5 for example ... I actually rarely found something even remotely close to the level of 5 year old by using nomenclature and vocabulary that most kids don't have at that age.
Also the question of quantitative and quality is given since 'lot' and 'meaningful' are orthogonal correlations.
So is it about engagement or value? I assume you mean from a growth perspective. Because to me one answer that helps me is better than 10 answers that could help me.
So we have the 'babel problem' and we have the shannon-weaver-model where we should reduce the noise in the communication to the thing that matters.
But how are you supposed to ask a question where you are not sure what the nature of question is?
Sorry Gg I am rambling as always. The answer kinda boils down to
Really hard questions usually don't get a lot of answers because few understand them. Also there is the group mentality problem, trigger words, the 'problem solver' issue where people don't listen to the end but already solve their expectation of your problem before you can fully formulate it.
So besides all this problems ... I would go for:
these are some of my thought. I would need more time to process and read up on studies also I am not really qualified in this field of expertise ^^.