I've been using CodeMate AI alongside peer reviews rather than replacing them.
Repository context has been especially useful for catching issues that go beyond the changed files.
Human reviewers are still essential for validating architecture, business logic, and final decisions.
I like that approach. AI works best as a reviewer alongside developers rather than replacing them. Repository context can surface issues earlier, while human reviewers still provide the judgment that's hard to automate.
Thanks! In larger codebases, understanding the surrounding context often matters just as much as reviewing the changed lines. It usually leads to more meaningful feedback.
BISWAJIT DASH
Software Developer
I've been using CodeMate AI alongside peer reviews rather than replacing them. Repository context has been especially useful for catching issues that go beyond the changed files. Human reviewers are still essential for validating architecture, business logic, and final decisions.