Vinit Yaduvanshi, interesting enough that I continued the conversation you have provided and now it’s claiming the article was written by me, not the AI :)

I think, to conclude our conversation here, we shouldn’t believe AI, as it’s just a LLM that is taught on large amounts of data. So it can serve you a purpose if you ask it too, but it would always tell you to check on official sources. And that fact that you can easily tell it was wrong and it immediately changes its claims to another extreme shows that you need to have your own critical thinking and not rely on the AI completely.

So, you can either believe me or not, but I have written it on my own for learning purposes, not for having debates who has written it. As a side effect I have prepared this article for others to see my perspective on this with the intention to help, not earn money or anything.

Vinit Yaduvanshi, my message to you is that you choose who to believe me or the AI, but since I could so easily turn AIs perspective upside down confirms that it's far from human so far.

Vasyl Latushko I'm not claiming that it's not written by you. I asked you about that because I am curious about when I watched reel to know a text written by chatGPT but in this scenario it may be wrong, I think we stop our conversation here and thanks clearing my doubt 👍