AI-generated code tends to look tidy. The names are sensible, the structure is familiar, and the comments read well. That polish is the risk. A reviewer who relaxes because the code looks right will m
Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post
the omissions list is the useful part. missing timeouts and unhandled failure paths are easy to automate, which leaves the human review for the claims and the edges. that’s roughly the split we use at Tomosu, flagging the omissions on every PR so the reviewer starts from the parts that need judgment.
odykyi
Agreed. Would like to see demo!