This flips the usual AI-for-CVs idea in exactly the right direction. Most tools help you sound more impressive; this one asks what you can actually prove, and that is far more useful when you are the one sitting across from a hiring manager.
The example that sold me is the AWS one — rewriting "I deployed services to AWS" as "I haven't used cloud services yet." From the hiring side, the honest version tells me more, because a polished claim that falls apart on the first follow-up question costs you the room. I also liked that the most useful output was not the table but the interview questions, and that each gap comes with a 7-day next step — it turns a shortcoming into a plan instead of just a rejection. And keeping a human approve-or-revise step in front of the checker matters, given your own note that the AI can invent evidence.
Thank you, Steven, I really appreciate this. I built ProofPack because I'm a student with limited experience and wanted an honest way to show what I can prove. Your point about a polished claim falling apart on the first follow-up question is exactly what I was trying to avoid.
This flips the usual AI-for-CVs idea in exactly the right direction. Most tools help you sound more impressive; this one asks what you can actually prove, and that is far more useful when you are the one sitting across from a hiring manager.
The example that sold me is the AWS one — rewriting "I deployed services to AWS" as "I haven't used cloud services yet." From the hiring side, the honest version tells me more, because a polished claim that falls apart on the first follow-up question costs you the room. I also liked that the most useful output was not the table but the interview questions, and that each gap comes with a 7-day next step — it turns a shortcoming into a plan instead of just a rejection. And keeping a human approve-or-revise step in front of the checker matters, given your own note that the AI can invent evidence.