This benchmark is interesting because it highlights something many developers miss: performance differences between frameworks are often more about architecture choices and defaults than raw capability. For example, TanStack Start’s explicit control and Vite-based pipeline can improve developer speed, while Next.js focuses more on server-first optimizations and ecosystem integration. � TanStack One thing I’d add is that real-world performance depends heavily on caching strategy, hydration cost, and app interactivity level, not just SSR benchmarks. A highly interactive app may behave very differently compared to a content-heavy site. It would be valuable to also compare Time to Interactive (TTI) and client-side navigation performance, since those often impact user experience more than initial SSR numbers. I’ve been exploring similar ideas around React architecture and performance trade-offs—this kind of data-driven comparison is exactly what the ecosystem needs.