Every time I switch AI tools, I risk losing the thread. The files are still there. Git carries the code. The new assistant can read the repository. What often disappears is the current understanding o

Markdown supported · ⌘↵ to post
Mihai_LeanZero
Executable specs only help when the verifier runs in CI. I treat the spec as a failing test until the automation proves the same path twice.
The per-target checkpoint idea is the part that makes this different from a shared summary, since Claude and Codex genuinely need different deltas depending on when each last checked in. What I don't see covered is concurrent writes to the same decision. If Claude and Codex are both active on the same task from different checkpoints and each supersedes the same decision differently before either syncs, something has to arbitrate which supersession wins, or surface the conflict instead of silently picking one. Git has merge semantics for exactly this. Does the current alpha have anything equivalent, or does it assume writes are effectively serialized through the user's approval flow?