The code was moving fast. Delivery looked great. But understanding was completely gone. That's what I ran into recently — and it stopped me cold. The High of Fast Execution "Vibe coding" is what some
ajitabh.net3 min read
This really resonates. I've been building automation systems for businesses and the pattern is identical — AI-generated workflows that work perfectly on day one but become unmaintainable black boxes within weeks. The fix I've found is treating AI output like a junior developer's PR: always review, always document the why behind each decision, and never skip the architecture phase just because generation is fast. The teams that pair AI speed with deliberate design thinking are shipping 3-4x faster without the debt spiral.
This resonates deeply. I've seen this exact pattern while building automation systems for clients — the initial AI-generated code ships fast, but when you revisit it 3 months later for a feature extension, you spend more time deciphering than you saved. What helped me was enforcing an "architecture-first" rule: before any AI generates a single line, I write a clear system design doc with module boundaries and naming conventions. The AI then works within those constraints rather than inventing its own structure. Curious — do you think architecture decision records (ADRs) could be a practical guardrail here?
This hits a real issue.
Vibe coding works great until you move from isolated outputs to systems. That’s where missing structure starts compounding, unclear data flow, hidden dependencies, and inconsistent behavior across components.
AI makes it easy to build fast, but it also makes it easier to skip the thinking that keeps things stable later.
Bhavin Sheth
Founder of AllInOneTools.net. I build simple, free, no-login web tools that solve small everyday problems.
This is real. AI speeds up output, but if you skip structure, you’re just building confusion faster. Felt this hard revisiting old code.