What WCAG actually catches when you scan a top-1000 site (Wikipedia case study)
I ran a fresh WCAG 2.1 scan on wikipedia.org this morning — a site that's arguably one of the most accessibility-conscious on the web.
Result: 90/100, with some genuinely instructive issues even on a site this mature.
The actual report (truncated)
{
...
devtoolsmith.hashnode.dev2 min read