So you think that this type of wealth distribution is sustainable in the lon-run and that it’s a better system than we currently have? Or do you think BTC will sort of only be a SoV/Niche asset class? Just an FYI, I don’t mean to come off as hostile. I actually respect you a lot and love reading your medium posts and the interview you did with Laura Shin. Also thanks for taking the time to respond to these questions 😁

I wouldn’t say my goal is socialism or perfectly distributed money - that’s one extreme. But there’s research out there that shows 4% of individuals hold 96% of all bitcoin. Even more so, 1% holds 88%. I would assume this only gets worse as the supply decreases and production power of coins is held by a few. I think inequality is something that people should take seriously, since it’s a huge issue in our current society. And I don’t think you should label “more fair” as socialism...

So the point of these protocols are to create a more fair playing field and instead they’re even more lopsided than current playing fields? Hmm....🤔

How do you feel about the inequality within crypto? Will a protocol be able to get to a multi-trillion dollar valuation if the founders/foundations take 15% right off the bat, meaning would you be okay with people being multi-billionaires/trillionaires? Same thing can be said about bitcoin, does satoshi owning 1 million BTC raise any concern?