As you surely know, that wasn't the point*. Neither does my comment rest on this "premise". So, replace "super dangerous weapon" by "thing that can be very dangerous when used incorrectly or irresponsibly" and the rest of the post is still fine. I doubt I have to repeat but I'll do it anyway. The point was, things with a higher likelyhood of being misused require some regulation. *Granted, nothing is a weapon in and of itself, it depends on usage. However, there are things which are less likely to endanger others (say, a banana) and those which have a higher likelihood of being misused, accidentally or not.

Your argumentation is super simplistic: "Here I built this super dangerous weapon. It's your responsibility now." That's not how it works. I am not "against the existence or availability of uncensored models whatsoever". There should be regulation though: There is a reason why we require humans to have a drivers license when they want to use a car. So that they know how to use it without endangering others. There is a reason why there are regulations with respect to cars. So that they are not a health hazard. There is a reason why there are regulations on how you can use your cars. So you don't drive 200mph in a neighbourhood. And if all of that doesn't help, there is a reason why we need you to ensure yourself against the damage you could do with your car (because you couldn't pay for it otherwise) and also register it (so that we know who did the damage). Don't see a lot of that in AI yet, unfortunately. With this, it's quite irresponsible to give open access to uncensored models.