I am a passionate woman fond of octopuses 馃悪馃悪
It took me a while to find my path, but as soon as I started programming, I knew it would define me for the rest of my life. I love everything that challenges my brain and can keep it interested. I was involved in projects in numerous domains, from quantum computing for particle physics to retail store interfaces. I don't know what I enjoy the most (as long as I can crunch code), so I try everything I come up with.
Currently working as a software engineer / SRE, I always have ongoing side projects and try to give back to the community through open-source and tech platforms (dev.to, StackOverflow).
Aside from my work, I love reading (especially time travel fiction) and spending time with other passionate people. To make the latter even easier, I co-founded the GDG Fribourg, which I hope you will check out if you are in Switzerland.
Nothing here yet.
Happy you liked it! And thank you for leaving a comment, it made my day. Type hints are still in their infancy, but I believe it will become a no brainier soon, given all the PEPs related to type hints. Pycharm is powerful, but only relying on an IDE is risky, as a wrong type hint is worst than none. I did the same on one of my projects (pycharm only) and was surprised how many mistakes I made when I turned on mypy. If you like the subject, have a look at my latest article discussing changes to type annotations https://blog.derlin.ch/python-type-hints-and-future-annotations
Well, it does support functional constructs such as immutability, high order function, composition and the like, but it let's you choose which paradigm(s) you want to use. There is also a lot of sugar coating, offering a great developer experience. I can't wait for your feedback on the next article then, I hope you will gain some insights from it :)