Diego Alejandro Peña Esnida

Mihai, you hit the nail on the head. The implicit dependency on the vendor's coding style (the if/assignment pair) is indeed the fragile link in this chain. If a patch reformats that file, the silent failure mode is catastrophic downstream because the pipeline would confidently trust corrupt data. I hadn't thought about the canary check at all, but your proposal is the missing guard needed to make this completely bulletproof in corporate production. Implementing a scheduled verification against a hardcoded, known baseline model to compare the parsed bounds vs what SupportHelper reports is the exact definition of a clean circuit breaker here. I’m definitely going to bake that canary routine into the orchestrator next week to make it fail loudly if Autodesk alters the script layout. Thanks for the insight—this is exactly the type of architecture review I was hoping for when writing this up. Appreciate the feedback