"If someone on your team goes that far, either fire them or teach them how to code." - Well said!

I freaking love this! Such a great summary. Always put pragmatism over "best practices" from internet. Always question the things and stay critical. Well done mate 🙌

Hello there! Indeed, this section is quite complex, and I see there were some details that I didn't explain well :( Let me try here in this reply, and see how it goes. We are not deploying to Ubuntu server. We are deploying to the Google Play console. The GitHub Action that will run when we push the code will spin up an Ubuntu virtual machine, and it will configure it accordingly (will install Java version 17 on it) Next, it will run the steps one after another. build the code, run the tests, generate an aab sign it deploy it to Google Play Once all these operations are done, the VM gets shut down, and released. I hope that I made it clearer a little but, but I won't be surprised if you need more details. Please do not hesitate to ask more questions if that's the case, I'm happy to answer them

It's lovely to see we are on the same page :) Indeed the term is widely used and know in the community 💯👌

That's an awesome article, I have to admit that I loved it a lot. Really nice writing style, easy to read and understand. No complex sentences and very good arguments. It would be of a great benefits for the community around you if you keep posting such good content with this writing style. Little remark about the following: through the use of test doubles, also known as mocks I talk about that in my last weekly video on youtube 👇, and basically there is some history of why the term Mocks is used in generic context to refer to all Test-Doubles , but the actual mock is a kind of test-double just like the stub , dummy , spy and fake . Would be interesting to see your opinions on that especially after watching the video: https://youtu.be/YQ9qlcq6Yyg