Couldn't agree more. This is exactly what’s happening in the project I’m currently working on at my company, which is why I was really looking forward to the solution you were going to propose. When you wrote, “Technical debt piles up past the point anyone can dig out from under it, and the only option left on the table is starting over. It's the most expensive outcome on this list, and it's the one bad design was quietly building toward the whole time,” and then followed it with “So what actually changes this?”, I thought you were going to get into some practical solutions. But the main takeaway seemed to be: consider design from the start, spend an hour on it, and it’ll save you a day later. I completely agree with that in principle, but unfortunately, that doesn’t really solve the problem once you’re already in the situation. What do you actually do when the technical debt has already piled up and you’re dealing with a system that’s difficult to change? I was hoping for some practical strategies for getting out of that situation, not just how to avoid it in the first place.