M P You're mixing everything. After teaching more than 2000 people, I know that there are a lot of sensitive people. And a lot of persons can easily feel offended. What you said can easily lead to things like "Hey, bro, I can insult all the women. ". And when you go in court, you'll say: "I was just joking, this girl is too fragile and delicate and shouldn't go on Internet". People like you might find normal to cross the line (otherwise you wouldn't write what you have written). Abhiraj was much more delicate in his answer and I hope that from now on he might take in consideration that sentences which might be negative for some persons should be avoided, especially at the beginning of an article, and especially if you say "you". Maybe if the sentence was "Everybody has heard of Web3 except the persons living under a rock.", this might be better because it doesn't imply directly the reader. Try to teach something to some people, and have more human interaction: it will radically change your point of view.

Abhiraj Bhowmick Starting with such expression is offensive to any reader who has never heard of "Web3". It's ok for me, it's part my job, but in general this is not a good start for an article.

"You've probably heard of Web3 unless you've been living under a rock.". This instantly insult all people who never heard about Web3. And, implies you're cheeky, ofc. Every single point said here is to the best not accurate, otherwise it's false. So as it said: "it's explained like I'm five".

Jarrod Watts With adequate comments this should be ok ;) And you're right, all other languages I've used allow such things: C, C++, C#, Go, Java, Php and Python. The problem is always: the limits of maintainability vs fast coding. Because you always end up with debugging someone else's code, I've chosen Python as my language for my job: it's much harder (still possible unfortunately...) to write "hard-to-understand" code.

"I also find it super cool that I can pass a function that returns a function as a parameter to another function!" This is why JavaScript is so hard to maintain. I can't even imagine how long that will take for another guy (even a JavaScript guru) to understand your code. It's very fun when you write it, it's hell when you have to maintain such code. And when you did not write this, you juste hate the developer who wrote this. So, no, IMHO, it's not super cool to be able to write complex things that will take hours for others to understand and debug when needed.

He wrote twice "a &&= 3" for "&&=" but also for "||=" ;)