I like that you kept the stage history as its own record instead of just overwriting a status column. One thing worth thinking about as this grows: policies protect who can touch the history, but nothing stops an admin (or a stray seeder) from editing or deleting rows and quietly corrupting the pipeline reports. I've started making history tables append-only at the DB level, a check or trigger that rejects updates and deletes, so the audit trail survives even admin mistakes. Cheap to add now, painful to retrofit once the reports are trusted.
Thank you for pointing this out! I actually wasn't aware of the append-only approach before. I'll definitely look into it. I'd also love to hear any other suggestions you might have for improving the project. Really appreciate your feedback!
Kamran Khan
Full-Stack Web Developer (React.js + Laravel) | Dashboards, SaaS Apps & Management Systems for Global Clients
I like that you kept the stage history as its own record instead of just overwriting a status column. One thing worth thinking about as this grows: policies protect who can touch the history, but nothing stops an admin (or a stray seeder) from editing or deleting rows and quietly corrupting the pipeline reports. I've started making history tables append-only at the DB level, a check or trigger that rejects updates and deletes, so the audit trail survives even admin mistakes. Cheap to add now, painful to retrofit once the reports are trusted.