Interesting premise. I feeel one needs to define, or somehow be clear about what is meant by "relevant knowledge". Things like, how to use facebook, howto use x, how to use tic tok - relevant forthe younder generation, essential fort hem. Not relevant to many in older generations - any not essential. How to use a rolodex, how to write cursive, how to read a paper map, how to fold a paper map - not relevant for a youger generation. Does this mean not relevant at all any more? Hmm. And you do not touch on things like common sense (could go on for a long time on that one), how to balance a checkbook or checking account, how to change a tire, how to change the oil, (hmm, not relevant if you have AAA or rely on Uber only, or don't have a car). How to communicate face to face. That skill IS getting lost. I am VERY happy to hear your children talking with their grandparents sufficient to have intelligent meaningful conversations. I am also gussing that what is relevant changes family tofamily, group to group,location to location.
In general, I do not agree that the next generation will surpass their parents in relevant knowledge. Well -that of course depends on mydefinition of relevan tknowledge. Relevant to/for what/whom? Noting that relevant can be swayed in favor of one generation or another quite easily. More to talk about here for sure. Interesting food for thought here.
Steven Feuerstein
Fascinating and important insight. This is, I think, a part of why elders are less respected today. And why knowledge/info/data is celebrated in its own right, but wisdom is downplayed or ignored. There's not time for wisdom and the appreciation of it. There is only time to focus on THE NEXT THING.